Friday, April 30, 2010

THE ROOTS OF TODAY'S RADICAL LEFTISTS

Leftists LOVE to call the Right “Fascists” or "Nazis" but nothing could be further from the truth as the Gunny’s research will point out. It was Mussolini who used the word “fascist” or “fascism” to describe how he adapted Marxism for the Italians after WW I. Unlike the heroes of America’s Left in the USSR, who went straight into Communism, Mussolini thought that Italy needed to go through a stage of capitalism first, before “true” socialism could be reached. Groupthink originated with the fascists and is one of the key ingredients of Obama’s radical leftists today. Liberal Fascism can be summed up as a form of extreme socialism, along national lines. And who brought these ideas into America after WW1? Why, as Glenn Beck has pointed out, and as the Gunny’s research points outs, the progressives, i.e., the forefather of today’s liberals, Woodrow Wilson, fascist, racist, and anti-American.

If one reads about Europe in postwar WW1, almost all of the following ills can be laid at Wilson’s feet. Once again, progressives, hereafter referred to as liberals (which is the name they go by today) sought to “reform” and to “fix” life for the masses, most notably in the areas of “corporate monopoly”, which they called “irresponsible (sound familiar?), promote organized labor (to fight the evil capitalists), and to protect consumers from the greedy corporate “profiteers” in banking, i.e., Wall St. (Again, sounds familiar doesn’t it?) The bottom line is that the progressives, led by Wilson, sought to control or rather “reform” the social order. Like Cass Sunstein, one of Obama’s CommieCzars, they embraced euthanasia to get rid of the weak, the infirm, and the elderly. Even in the 1920’s, these early liberals lied to people nonstop, in every way, shape, and form, as they tried to replace the free market system, make the economy “more equal”, remove the onerous “private property” belief in America, and apply “fairness” to everyone in the land. Of course as we all know, some pigs are more equal than others, just look at Obummer and Date Night for example, living large, on our dime. Progressives sought to manage the lives of Americans through theological liberalism, which is nothing more than a belief in the State, and that a utopia was just around the corner.

EXCERPT: “The Progressive movement swept America from roughly the early 1890s through the early 1920s, producing a broad popular consensus that government should be the primary agent of social change. To that end, legions of idealistic young crusaders, operating at the local, state, and federal levels, seized and wielded sweeping new powers and enacted a mountain of new legislation, including minimum wage and maximum hour laws, antitrust statutes, restrictions on the sale and consumption of alcohol, appropriations for hundreds of miles of roads and highways, assistance to new immigrants and the poor, women's suffrage, and electoral reform, among much else.” (“The Progressive Era and Race”, D. Southern)

Sounds JUST LIKE the Obummer Administration doesn’t it. “Seized and wielded sweeping new powers,” like Obummer and his Executive Orders! ”Enacted a mountain of new legislation,” ObummerKare, Crap and Tax, Scamnesty, etc.

In fact, Southern's book pointed out that the liberals had already infiltrated universities in America with their poisonous thought. Southern stated: "budding progressives not only read exposes of capitalistic barons and attacks on laissez-faire economics by muckraking journalists, they also read racist tracts that drew on the latest anthropology, biology, psychology, sociology, eugenics, and medical science." Sounds like something one might read in the NY Obama Times or hear out of the oral sewer of Ol Tingly Leg Chrissy Matthews! 

Oh, and when liberals call us racists, let us remind them that it was Woodrow Wilson, the DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT, who allowed Jim Crow laws to come to Washington DC as he allowed departments in the US Government to segregate the dining facilities, work spaces, and toilets. Wilson was a staunch supporter of racial segregation but the liberals usually overlook that. In fact, it was in 1924 that the KKK was in heavily in bed with the Democrats. The KKK participated as delegates for the Democrats and blocked a platform plank that would have condemned their order. (The Gunny is not sure if Senator KKK Byrd was there in his sheets or not.) It was the KKK that endorsed William McAdoo (Wilson’s son-in-law) for President. One has to wonder WHY Americans Jews vote Democrat when it is Democrats who HATE Jews. It was in 1938 that a Gallup Poll showed 50% of Democrats in the US would support an anti-Jewish campaign (like what was going on in Germany at the time) vice Republicans at 15%. Racists and Racism? That would be the Democrats.

But wait, could it be that Wilson also sought to oppress Americans, much as Obummer seeks to do through his CommieCzars? Why, yes, for it was Wilson who created the “American Protective League” who operated how Hitler’s Brownshirts would and how Obummer’s Civilian National Security Force will, as they were strictly charged by Wilson to: intimidate Americans, crush dissent, issue beat downs to “slackers” and “malcontents” as determined by the Administration. Oh, and could it have been that Wilson created the first propaganda organ in America? Why yes, it would be. Wilson’s progressive agenda soon took over “every possible area of culture and society, education, religion, industry, the arts, local community and family included, with a kind of terror always waiting in the wings — came with the American war state under Wilson.” (Nisbet) 

A famous quote of Wilson’s that you WILL NOT see in the history books (the Gunny actually stumbled across it) "Conformity will be the only virtue and any man who refuses to conform will have to pay the penalty." Sounds like something Stalin or Hitler might have said. 

The Leftists in America LOVE FDR. He is their god but what did he say in 1933?

"If we are to go forward we must move as a trained and loyal army willing to sacrifice for the good of a common discipline, because, without such discipline, no progress is made, no leadership becomes effective. We are, I know, ready and willing to submit our lives and property to such discipline because it makes possible a leadership which aims at a larger good". (FDR- Inaugural Address in 1933) Sounds like something that Hitler or Obama might have said!

Two points are salient here on the racism of FDR and the Progressives then. One, the Scottsboro Boys. FDR refused to pardon them. Two, FDR refused asylum for the German Jews aboard the SS St. Louis and sent them back to Germany in 1939. No doubt few lived through the next years.

Socialism, liberalism, fascism, no matter what the term is, it is oppressive and anti-American. FDR instituted massive spending campaigns by big government (that he grew more and more), implemented public-works programs, i.e., Hoover Dam, and created the NRA (not the National Rifle Assoc) but rather, the National Recovery Act, which seized control of businesses, wages, services, and products. FDR also tried to get national healthcare in there as well. But who else did this stuff? Why, Herr Hitler himself. From the national autobahn system to the “Volkswagen” (people’s car) to governmental control over German industry and small businesses, to a social security system for the German people (oh yeah FDR did the same thing!), and of course, unemployment compensation. Again, it sure sounds familiar doesn’t it? Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Nazi, Fascist. All a left-wing agenda.

Hitler stated to Ambassador William Dodd: “that he was 'in accord with the President in the view that the virtue of duty, readiness for sacrifice, and discipline should dominate the entire people. These moral demands which the President places before every individual citizen of the United States are also the quintessence of the German state philosophy, which finds its expression in the slogan "The Public Weal Transcends the Interest of the Individual.” Well ain’t that something else. The Fuehrer and FDR are hand-in-hand down the Progressive path! Of course as Hitler imprisoned the Jews in concentration camps, so did FDR. Oh, and FDR did it all with an Executive Order, EO 9066. (Ain’t research grand libs?) BTW, one of the few government officials to publicly protest this was Governor Carr of Colorado. Oh, and Carr was a Republican.

Oh, and one other point on the infiltration of America’s universities by libcommies is needed here:

"President James Conant of Harvard University ignored the anti-Semitism of Hitler in the 30’s and actually assisted Hitler’s efforts to improve Nazi Germany’s image in America! For example, Harvard faculty held a “mock trial” of Herr Hitler in 1934 and came to the ruling that his [Hitler] anti-Semitism and actions against Jews were unrelated to the trial! A simple review of the events of the day on Harvard shows that Nazi leaders were invited to Harvard to attend debates and social events! Talk about aiding and comforting the enemy, Harvard's fifth columnists offered encouragement to the Nazi’s even as they persecuted the Jews! Progressives, leftists, liberals, whatever they’re called, they infested our universities back then and it’s only gotten worse.

Did anyone protest? Why yes, they did. What happened? They protested in Harvard Square, seven protestors were arrested and sentenced to six months at hard labor. Harvard leaders called the demonstrators "very ridiculous." Sounds like liberals describing the Tea Party and the folks in the Tea Party.

In conclusion, Fascism is to Leftism as evil is to the Devil. Liberalism has its roots twisted in the writings and beliefs of the German Leftists in the late 1800’s and fascism in the 20's and onward. The American Left was made politically powerful by Wilson and FDR. The situation we find ourselves in today is like Rosie O’Donnell suddenly finding out that she tips the scales at 400 pounds! It did not happen overnight! KNOW YOUR HISTORY my friends because the Left HATES to hear that Progressives Leftists were and are in step with scum like Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Lenin, and who followed the crap issued by Hegel, Engel, Marx, George Bernard Shaw, etc. Liberals will desperately try to claim that these people were a fringe element but in reality, these liberal “progressives” were in the forefront of American political and intellectual life. And WHO stood against these racists? The Republican Party and Conservatism, then in its infancy. This is why we must continue to stand against the Left. Those who went before us fought Wilson, FDR, and the scumbags on the Left tooth and nail. Can we do anything less? We have a hard fight to beat back the Progressives, let us not shrink from our duty as Americans. Let the following generations of Americans look back at our actions and say: “Quis Superabit” (Who shall excel them?)

58 comments:

  1. Good post Gunny!
    The left is engaged in projection as usual. They are unable to debate issues on their merits so they use the only tool they have; emotion! They call their opponents names.
    Are we forever condemned to have the enemy amongst us? That's the price of freedom I guess.

    "Back in the thirties we were told we must collectivize the nation because the people were so poor. Now we are told we must collectivize the nation because the people are so rich." William F Buckley Jr.

    ReplyDelete
  2. rikdergis,

    WFB is sorely missed. His son is a pale pale comparison to him. Thank GOD WFB did not have to see his son endorse and vote for a commie like Obummer.

    ReplyDelete
  3. if you quote Glen Beck your clearly an idiot. Once I saw that, I stopped reading. The guy stated that he was a comedian. So, I took him at his word. I'm not about to quote Jon Stewart, and use it as leverage in a blog...because he's a comedian. Once again, it proves how stupid, your own argument is. Most of you guys are probably white men, who really don't like people of color. I wish one of you pathetic idiots would just have the courage to say it. I wish we could deport all you racist fu*ckers. Because technically, according to history whites are illegals as well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We will only displace the leftist if enough of us conservatives get engaged in our civic duty of participating in the real ball game of politics -- party politics -- as precinct committeemen. The grass roots conservatives who want to "do something" could take over the Republican Party overnight because HALF the precinct committeemen slots in the Republican Party were vacant in the 2008 election cycle. Go here to learn about the Neighborhood Precinct Committeeman Strategy. It's working in Nevada and Utah.

    www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com

    For Liberty,
    Cold Warrior

    ReplyDelete
  5. Man do you sound like me sometimes! I've had this arguement many times with the idiot left telling me how Hitler was on the right. That just can't fathom that he was a leftist but he was so narcissistic that he thought the Soviets were doing it all wrong. Than they throw out the race thing and say if it was socialism than he would be a racist. Funny though, both Marx and Engels advocated getting rid of the "Lazy cultures" which was directed at races.
    The only reason this arguement exist is because so many leftist writers tried to rewrite and spin history to make Hitler look like he wasn't a leftist.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Fire the GOP,

    Typical reply from a leftist. Can't beat the facts, play the race card and insult the messenger.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey! Fire the GOP, you ARE a racist and if you are a black person, not very knowledgeable about history. You may not know this, but it's the Democrats that fought to protect slavery. The Republican party was founded against slavery. It was the Democrats that are and always have been the heart and core of the KKK. It's the democrats that want you to depend on the government and beg them to provide for you. All the Republicans want is for you to work hard, become successful, gain personal wealth, pass it on to your heirs, and live a life with peace, freedom and personal liberty. Obama wants you to grovel to him for your healthcare, your money, your housing and everything else. Wise up! You're embarrassing yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  8. theprecinctproject,

    I agree with the point that we need to get more seriously involved with politics. We've been teh silent majority far too long.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Jim,

    That and they HATE to admit that Wilson and FDR were progressive and racist liberals.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Fire the GOP, thank you for proving my point!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Good post as always Gunny. Seems each day, you seem to get better.
    the Obamaite that posted is a good laugh. Like all left wingers, can't post anthing sensible, or constructive. Everything must be RAAAACIST.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jim,

    Fire the GOP is a whiny angry leftist child. I'm working on an essay about their emotionalism right now and will post it Monday.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'll never understand why Jews vote for Democrats... it bothers me, because all the jews i've met and worked with seemed to be smart people.

    ReplyDelete
  14. E.

    Indeed. I've asked Jews I know about that and they state that they think the Right will be worse but cannot state how!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Gunny,
    As angry as I was with my dem Representative yesterday, it is only fair to tell you that they put him in the yea column in two different places on the Puerto Rican vote. They corrected it and put him in the Nay column. But that doesn't make up for the junk he has done as a dem in the past. Just wanted to let you know.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Nanna,

    That is the left for you. It's ALL ABOUT race warfare to them.

    ReplyDelete
  17. From the Associated Press:

    "The spill — a slick more than 130 miles long and 70 miles wide — threatens hundreds of species of wildlife, including birds, dolphins and the fish, shrimp, oysters and crabs that make the Gulf Coast one of the nation's most abundant sources of seafood. Louisiana closed some fishing grounds and oyster beds because of the risk of oil contamination."
    ===

    Can I get a heartfelt Palin-chant from you moronic rightoid troglodytes?

    C'mon, idiots, shout it out:

    "Drill, baby, drill. Drill, baby, drill."

    Bwahahahahahaha!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Oh Ivan, you excite me so much! I'll cover myself with CRUDE oil and then drill baby drill just like you like it, nice an deep.

    ReplyDelete
  19. At 09:26, Gunsel intoned:
    >Let the following generations
    >of Americans look back at our
    >actions and say:
    >“Quis Superabit”

    Yep, you're a super rabbit all right, Gunster.

    Er, what's up, doc?

    (Actually, I think it far more likely that following generations will look back at you racist wretches and wonder, "How did Americans restrain themselves from seizing all those hate-wracked rightoid bastards and grinding them up for fertilizer?")

    ReplyDelete
  20. Que pasa, Ivan?
    Can't understand enough Latin to correct Gunny?

    Quo vadis?

    Actually, they will look back and wonder why Americans tolerated s.uch hate from the left

    ReplyDelete
  21. Louisana is going to be a combination of Katrina and Exxon Valdis for Obama. He pulled a Nero, fiddling while the oil flowed.

    ReplyDelete
  22. E, I'm a half-Jew and I can give you an answer. Jewish people have an enormous amount of empathy; so much that it frequently prevents them from thinking rationally. This empathy makes them easy prey for leftists who peddle guilt to advance their agenda. You've no doubt heard of "liberal guilt" and the stereotype of the "self-hating" Jew. They feed into each other.

    I always try to tell Jews that the Democrats run on Nazi blood money (Geroge Soros, may he burn in hell for what he did), but they usually reply with the usual "I wanna help people" crap they've been fed and vote Dem anyway. When an ethnicity is this committed to its own self-destrcution, it makes you wonder how they lasted this long in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  23. (Actually, I think it far more likely that following generations will look back at you racist wretches and wonder, "How did Americans restrain themselves from seizing all those hate-wracked rightoid bastards and grinding them up for fertilizer?")
    Ivan, you mean like your heros Mao Ze-Dong and Jozef Stalin? Yes, that's the left's idea of fairness and equallity, kill anyone that oppose them and grind them into fertilizer. Yes your leftist brothers have quite a track record of making fertilizer. Let's see between Mao Ze-Dong, Jozef Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot, Kim Il Sung, Benito Mussolini, Vladimir Lenin, Fidel Castro and your all time favorite Che Guevara, they made what about 1,000,000,000 people into fertilizer. Aren't you so very proud!

    ReplyDelete
  24. I understand anti-trust laws.
    On the one hand you have companies like Bell Telephone that provided excellent service at reasonable rates.
    Bell was broken up by the government. For 30+ years the telephone service was on a sub-par with Russia.
    On the other hand why do Unions not come under anti-trust laws?
    Their monopoly on the auto plant employees has driven the price of Ford and Chevy up to astronomical proportions.
    It was unions that forced railroads to KEEP a Fireman on diesel locomotives....long after the useful purpose of a Fireman had gone to the roundhouse.

    ReplyDelete
  25. "Every asshole who ever chanted 'Drill baby drill' should have to report to the Gulf coast today for cleanup duty."
    -Bill Maher

    ReplyDelete
  26. "Every asshole who ever chanted 'Drill baby drill' should have to report to the Gulf coast today for cleanup duty."
    -Bill Maher

    Spoken like one who never work with oil workers.

    He probably doesn't want windmills spoiling his view or making nasty whoosh sounds.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Looks like Obama is following in JFK's footsteps.

    And the Enquirer had it right about Edwards

    http://www.nationalenquirer.com/obama_cheating_scandal_vera_baker_video_/celebrity/68589

    ReplyDelete
  28. Pretty much sums it up Gunny.

    Left, Lib progressive, fascist, nazi, or whatever kind of pig they try to lipstick up = anti GOD.
    These lowlife sobs don't believe in and hate God, they have eaten satans fruit and become as god and need to control us.
    The right, the good, the not so f***ing ugly who love and defend God, Family and Country.

    Oh yea just because osamabinobama and ilk blew up the oil rig and killed innocent people I still say DRILL BABY DRILL. F**K the binobama, ivanazak and the horse they rode in on and may God Bless America and God damn osamabinobama, the rev wrong, billie bomber ayers and all who support fbhobo.

    ReplyDelete
  29. News item (with my astute commentary in [parentheses])

    OBAMA TAKES DIRECT AIM AT
    ANTI-GOVERNMENT RHETORIC

    ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) – President Barack Obama took aim Saturday at the angry rhetoric of those who denigrate government as "inherently bad" and said their off-base line of attack ignores the fact that in a democracy, "government is us."

    [Rightoids don't care, because rightoids fear and loathe democracy.]

    Obama used his commencement speech at the University of Michigan to respond to foes who portray government as oppressive and tyrannical — and to warn that overheated language can signal extremists that "perhaps violence is ... justifiable."

    [Something which the devious, propagandizing Gunster repeats ad nauseum, in his continuing effort to persuade some mental defective to turn a weapon against government workers or political figures.]

    Just 45 miles from the immense Michigan Stadium, capacity 106,201, the GOP's 2008 vice presidential nominee, Sarah Palin, told an anti-tax gathering Obama's policies are "big government" recipes that are "intrusive" in the lives of average Americans.

    [As usual, the brain-dead beauty queen wannabe declined to explain exactly how she thinks government under Obama has increased its "intrusiveness" into the lives of ordinary people. That's because, as usual, she's lying, as she was when she gave her absurd non-reasons for quitting the Alaska governorship halfway through her first term. But then, she's shrewd enough to understand that she need not explain how government under Obama has increased its "intrusiveness" into the lives of ordinary people, since her fans are conservatives, and conservatives don't need reasons, only slogans.]

    [...]

    Government, (Obama) said, is the roads we drive on and the speed limits that keep us safe. It's the men and women in the military, the inspectors in our mines, the pioneering researchers in public universities.

    [Of course, conservatives would sell the roads to private companies, abolish speed limits, fire the mine inspectors and researchers and padlock the public universities. They'd keep the military, of course, because conservatives orgasm when their guys kill folks.]

    The financial meltdown dramatically showed the dangers of too little government, he said, "when a lack of accountability on Wall Street nearly led to the collapse of our entire economy."

    [Reagan and Bush broke it; Obama & Co. look to be well on their way to fixing it.]

    [...]

    Obama urged both sides in the political debate to tone it down. "Throwing around phrases like 'socialists' and 'Soviet-style takeover,' 'fascists' and 'right-wing nut' — that may grab headlines," he said. But it also "closes the door to the possibility of compromise..."

    [As the Republicans have proven time and again, but particularly since the election of the first black man to the presidency, conservatives have no interest whatsoever of compromising or helping to ensure Americans get the good government they deserve. The Repugs want only to obstruct, delay, stall and impede any effort at governance until they can re-seize power and continue their wholesale sell-off of America to their *white* corporate friends and backers. Fortunately, it appears Obama is not going to let that happen. How can anyone not like him?]

    ReplyDelete
  30. Wow Gunny you have picked up a wigger(little white dude who worships blacks pretending to be black,fire the GOP).

    ReplyDelete
  31. Bill Maher questions Obama's lack of action

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/05/01/maher_why_isnt_barack_obama_getting_more_shit_for_the_oil_spill.html

    ReplyDelete
  32. I forgot but you can lump illegal no good sican bas***ds in the group with osamabinobama and the ivanzak as well.

    ReplyDelete
  33. A covert operation to blow up an oil rig is as good a conspiracy thory as one to blow up office buildings.

    I'm sure someone will float one ( pardon the pun) blaming either the ri.ght or left

    ReplyDelete
  34. Quoting Hillary Clinton

    "I'm sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we're Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration"

    ReplyDelete
  35. I wonder why the liberals make a big deal of the first black CIC , but raged against the black sec of States. and the black supreme court justice. Only those that stay on the lib plantation are not attacked.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Hey Ivan, there were no coal mining disasters during the Bush administration, there were no oil well disasters under the Bush administration either. Let's see, the economy has tanked, unemployment has soared, racism has bloomed, we've had the worst mining disaster in 50 years and the worst oil disaster ever, the contrie is more divided than ever. This can only mean one thing, you lord and master the Obamanation is a disaster. He is a complete and utter failure.
    BTW; the only one I heard say drill baby was your lover Lemmiwinks.

    ReplyDelete
  37. News item (with my astute commentary in [parentheses])

    OBAMA TAKES DIRECT AIM AT
    ANTI-GOVERNMENT RHETORIC

    ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) – President Barack Obama took aim Saturday at the angry rhetoric of those who denigrate government as "inherently bad" and said their off-base line of attack ignores the fact that in a democracy, "government is us."

    {Proof that Obama is the problem, the government is no longer representatives of the people but rather professional politicians, in other words they are NOT US}

    Obama used his commencement speech at the University of Michigan to respond to foes who portray government as oppressive and tyrannical — and to warn that overheated language can signal extremists that "perhaps violence is ... justifiable."

    {Proof that the tyrant knows that he is the problem and that we (unlike his mindless minions) are smart enough to know it and we are not going to bow to his tyrany and he's wetting his UndeRoos knowing that we are not affraid of the idiot}

    Just 45 miles from the immense Michigan Stadium, capacity 106,201, the GOP's 2008 vice presidential nominee, Sarah Palin, told an anti-tax gathering Obama's policies are "big government" recipes that are "intrusive" in the lives of average Americans.

    {Wow, someone in government that understands that they are suppose to serve us and not try to rule us. Brilliant, unlike the Marxist idiot the naive and the mind dulled minions ellected foolishly in the last election.}

    Government, (Obama) said, is the roads we drive on and the speed limits that keep us safe. It's the men and women in the military, the inspectors in our mines, the pioneering researchers in public universities.

    {Of course Obama wants us to drive only when he says, at two MPH under heavy surveillance and paying a heavy fine for doing so}

    The financial meltdown dramatically showed the dangers of too little government, he said, "when a lack of accountability on Wall Street nearly led to the collapse of our entire economy."

    {If the idiots on the left in government hadn't forced the banks to make bad loans in the first place, there would have been no "meltdown". Of course than he wouldn't have had a shot at involking his Marxist buddies Coward and Pinhead's theory of destroying the economy}

    Obama urged both sides in the political debate to tone it down. "Throwing around phrases like 'socialists' and 'Soviet-style takeover,' 'fascists' and 'right-wing nut' — that may grab headlines," he said. But it also "closes the door to the possibility of compromise..."

    {"These are not the droids you're looking for" forget it Obamy, your leftist mind tricks won't work on us, they only work on really weak minds like...like...Ivan! Of course the morons on the left will be controlled by the mind tricks and make accusations like racism and astroturf, but anyone with half a brain can see it's only the work of a two-bit Chicago thug that thinks he's the messiah but is really just a narcissistic idiot}

    ReplyDelete
  38. At 13:05, Pack Rat scribbled:

    >I wonder why the liberals [...]
    >raged against the black sec of
    >States (sic).

    Probably because Colin Powell disgraced himself and this country more profoundly than any other secretary of state (NOT "states") in American history. He went before the entire world at the UN and told a raft of lies -- knowing they were lies -- in order to ingratiate himself with an incompetent president desperate for an excuse to send the country to an illegal and needless war. In doing so, Powell committed a moral crime that, as a smarter man than I once said, "will live in infamy."

    >and the black supreme court justice.

    Liberals didn't rage against Thurgood Marshall, fool.

    But assuming you meant Clarence Thomas, it was because Thomas was a serial sexual harasser and an extreme right-wing ideologue who was and is not fit to serve on the nation's highest court, and wouldn't be, whatever the color of his skin.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I knew why, I just want to see it admitted complete with talking points.

    Why no comments on Rice? She was black and Secretary of State.

    Re: Thomas, why was he comfirmed. Because his accuser was not a credible witness. With all of the sexual harassment policies in effect at the time, she could have filed at the time of the offense, but she did not.

    ReplyDelete
  40. At 11:28, Pack Rat babbled:

    >Why no comments on Rice?

    What comments were you expecting?

    >She was black and Secretary
    >of State.

    She was also stupid, dishonest ("I believe the [intelligence memo's] title was 'Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.'" moments after she claimed the U.S. had not been forewarned about the 9/11 attacks) and incompetent and a knee-jerk apologist for Bush's illegal and pointless war of choice -- none of which has anything to do with her race, just her character.

    >Re: Thomas [...] his accuser was
    >not a credible witness.

    Yes, she was, although the legislators chose to ignore Anita Hill's indictment of Thomas as a harasser and pervert (surprise, surprise). Her credibility is indisputable, evidenced by the apology later issued by author David Brock, who wrote a critical book about Hill that he himself later denounced as "character assassination," accusing himself of having been "a witting cog in the Republican sleaze machine."

    >With all of the sexual harassment
    >policies in effect at the time,
    >she could have filed at the time
    >of the offense, but she did not.

    Her mistake. But then, it's hardly the first time an ambitious woman swallowed her pride and kept her mouth shut about sexual harassment, knowing that her harasser would be believed while she'd be dismissed (literally as well as figuratively).

    Thomas was and remains a disgrace. Hill's reputation has long since been rehabilitated.

    It's fascinating that you rightoids will excuse even the most vile behavior in a person, as long as he cleaves to conservative orthodoxy.

    Only one more reason why you assholes are now on the outside looking in.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Quote "She was also stupid, dishonest ... and incompetent..."
    Fact
    "Rice has appeared on the Time 100, Time magazine's list of the world's 100 most influential people, four times Rice is one of only nine people in the world whose influence has been considered enduring enough to have made the list—first compiled "

    ReplyDelete
  42. At 20:31, Jimmie stammered:

    >the government is no longer
    >representatives of the people but
    >rather professional politicians, in other
    >words they are NOT US}

    If by "US" you mean American conservatives, then the only representatives who would remotely be representative of your quality, intelligence and character would be inmates of the country's lowest-rent trailer parks, winos and various breeds of farm animals.

    >and he's wetting his UndeRoos
    >knowing that we are not affraid (sic)
    >of the idiot}

    Oh yeah, President Barack Hussein Obama is simply terrified of the likes of you half-bright legends-in-your-own-minds. Sure he is.

    But seriously, Jiminy . . . if anything is clear it's that you rightoids ARE afraid. You're afraid of -- almost everything in today's world. You're afraid of blacks and brown-skinned immigrants and Muslims. You're afraid of liberals, progressives, scientists, academics, public-school teachers, independent-minded jurists, atheists, hippies, druggies and virtually all teenagers. You're afraid of strong women and the poor and labor unions and anyone who tries to assert his/her legal rights and any group that supports them. You're afraid of "socialism" and "communism" and every other "ism" except "patriotism" -- a concept the meaning of which eludes you completely. You're also terrified of things that go bump in the night, which is why you "cling to your guns" as if they were a baby's security blanket. Not afraid? You rightoids are, in fact, the "afraidest" people in America.

    >>Sarah Palin, told an anti-tax
    >>gathering . . .

    >Wow, someone in government
    >that (sic) understands that they are
    >suppose (sic) to serve us and not try
    >to rule us.

    Here's a news flash for ya, Jimbo: Sarah Palin hasn't been "in government" since she collapsed under the weight of responsibility and mounting evidence of malfeasance in office and resigned the governorship of Alaska halfway through her first term. Typical incompetent rightoid moron.

    Thanks for playing, Jimmie. Come again.

    ReplyDelete
  43. "If by "US" you mean American conservatives, then the only representatives who would remotely be representative of your quality, intelligence and character would be inmates of the country's lowest-rent trailer parks, winos and various breeds of farm animals"

    Typical liberal approach, attack by social class.... no wonder you lost VA, NJ and will lose more as you insult the voters with arrogant attitudes

    I can see from other posts that the only "strong women" they like adhere to their party line.
    Let a women be strong and conservative4, and out come the knives and visious comments.

    Thanks for being so dependable, Ivan.
    You parrot those talking points so faithfully. ( Can I use the word faith?

    All this talk of fear from one who fears serving in the miltary.

    ReplyDelete
  44. At 14:05, Rack Pat gibbered:

    >Typical liberal approach,
    >attack by social class

    Last time I looked, Packy, conservatives didn't comprise a "social class." Only an *intelligence* class, by which I mean, dumb as shit.

    >you insult the voters

    I don't need to insult conservative voters. They insult themselves with their support of political and social troglodytes and brain-dead losers like John McCain, Sarah ("I can see Russia from my house!") Palin and the ridiculous Mike Huckabee.

    >visious comments.

    I've never seen any visious comments. Where does one go to see visious comments?

    >Thanks for being so dependable, Ivan.

    Thanks for being so dependably illiterate, Packy.

    >Can I use the word faith?

    Use it all you want. It's a perennial favorite of hucksters, charlatans and liars of all stripes.

    >All this talk of fear from
    >one who fears serving in the
    >miltary.

    Anyone who doesn't fear serving in a force of expendable, walking-meat cannon fodder is a fool.

    "The pioneers of a warless world are the youth who refuse military service." -Albert Einstein

    Those who resist military service are the true heroes. Those who obediently march off to kill people and die in the service of politicians who remain safely at home are too stupid even to qualify as sheep. -Ivan

    It would be hilarious if it weren't so disturbing: You rightoids rage unceasingly at politicians, yet never, ever question when those selfsame politicians order you to trundle off to kill folks on some foreign shore and perhaps die in the doing. You are worse than sheep. You are homicidal sheep, brainless and pathologically compliant.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Thanks to the resident editor, but Ivan you still can't tell the difference between Tina Fey and Sarah Palin. Quote: "Sarah ("I can see Russia from my house!") Palin”

    "Those who resist military service are the true heroes" Since there is no draft, what is there to resist? Actually, someone as unstable as you probably could not qualify to enter the military if you wanted to get in.

    ReplyDelete
  46. The rest of the story
    "I am not only a pacifist but a militant pacifist. I am willing to fight for peace. Nothing will end war unless the people themselves refuse to go to war.
    Albert Einstein "


    All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree.
    Albert Einstein


    Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish.
    Albert Einstein

    Information is not knowledge.
    Albert Einstein

    ReplyDelete
  47. Once again the improper/incomplete use of a word:

       /ɪˈlɪtərɪt/ Show Spelled[ih-lit-er-it] Show IPA
    –adjective
    1.unable to read and write: an illiterate group.
    2.having or demonstrating very little or no education.
    3.showing lack of culture, esp. in language and literature.
    4.displaying a marked lack of knowledge in a particular field: He is musically illiterate.

    ReplyDelete
  48. That's illititerate if you could not figure it out

    ReplyDelete
  49. OK, Ivan wants to play today, usually you cowar away from me. Fine, let's start with your attack on Clarence Thomas. You defend Bill Clinton; a serial rapist with numerous victims compalints, but attack someone with a single allegation. Clinto white, Thomas black... Ivan is a racist pig!!!
    Let see, Colin Powel repeat the same information to the UN that Bill Clinton said to Congress. Yet you only attack Colin...Ivan is a Racist Pig!!!


    By US I meant Tax paying citizens like many of the blogers here. I didn't mean would be inmates of the country's lowest-rent trailer parks, winos and various breeds of farm animals i.e You and Lemmiwinks.

    Funny that a cowardly leftist trailer trash racist loser like you Ivan would suggest that I'm affraid of anything. I'll buy you a ticket to Florida anytime to test your theory you little yellow wimp!

    ReplyDelete
  50. At 20:42 Jimbelina raged:

    >Colin Powel (sic) repeat (sic)
    >the same information to the UN
    >that Bill Clinton said to
    >Congress.

    Jimbo, you are without a doubt the biggest moron here -- and that's saying something. Was Bill Clinton president on 9/11? Was Colin Powell Clinton's secretary of state? Look it up, shit-for-brains. Actually, don't bother. You probably wouldn't understand it if you did.

    Things Jimmie thinks are words:
    -cowar
    -compalints
    -blogers
    -affraid

    Things that aren't words:
    -cowar
    -compalints
    -blogers
    -affraid

    Thanks for the laugh, chucklehead.

    ReplyDelete
  51. At 6:44, Rat Pack mumbled:

    >That's illititerate if you could
    >not figure it out

    "Illititerate," eh? Is that the quality of not being able to spell the word 'breast?'

    (Man, you are so easily OWNED! Thanks for playing, chump.)

    ReplyDelete
  52. Ivan, you are a good spell checker, I can depend on you for that.

    As for comprehension, you get an F.
    Jim point was that Clinton had made the same claims about Iraq's WMD capability. Look it up.

    You are so predictable. Playing the school teacher while avoiding the subject of the discussion is your M.O..

    Go back to reading your coloring book.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Oh well, I know you can't find non-liberal sites, so here is the fact checked version of those quotes by Democrats concerning Saddam and WMD's.
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

    ReplyDelete
  54. Darn it PackRat, He's my spell chequre! He falls for it every time!
    Hey Ivan, wanna get off welfare? I've got a job for you! I'll even pay you above minimum wage.

    Do you want the ticket or does the thought of standing face to face with a man that doesn't want to have sex with you scare the crap out of you....

    You're a little coward Ivan


    Oh and everyone look here!

    What was it you said Ivan, (Man, you are so easily OWNED! Thanks for playing, chump.)
    Oh yea, that was it, I owned you three times! Thanks for playing loser!
    Let me be clear: A military operation cannot destroy all the weapons of mass destruction capacity. But it can and will leave him significantly worse off than he is now in terms of the ability to threaten the world with these weapons or to attack his neighbors.
    Bill (Rapemeawoman) Clinton Feb. 17, 1998

    Full text: http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/17/transcripts/clinton.iraq/

    "When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for."
    Bill (Rapemeawoman) Clinton July 2003 Larry King Show

    Ivan is wrong again! I know everyone knew that, but there you go.

    ReplyDelete
  55. You are so easy Ivan, your little Stewie Griffin brain is so easy to manipulate. You are so predictable. Playing the school teacher while avoiding the subject of the discussion is your M.O..
    Go back to reading your coloring book Ivan.

    What was it you said? (Man, you are so easily OWNED! Thanks for playing, chump.)
    I owned you three times you mindless twit!

    ReplyDelete
  56. At 05:15, Pat Rack leapt to Jimbo's defence, intoning:

    >Jim point was that Clinton
    >had made the same claims about
    >Iraq's WMD capability.

    The *same* claims? Nonsense. Clinton certainly did his share of fear-mongering about Iraq, and his bombing campaign against that country was disgraceful and, AFAIC, a war crime. But nothing Clinton said came close to the litany of specific and detailed lies Colin Powell deliberately fed the entire world during his speech at the United Nations on Feb. 5, 2003.

    To wit:

    -Powel claimed Iraq had bought special aluminum tubes whose only possible use was in uranium enrichment centrifuges. This was a lie.

    -Powell showed a photo he said depicted "decontamination vehicles" in Iraq. Turned out they were just firefighting equipment.

    -Powell claimed the Iraqis had illegal rockets and launchers hidden in the palm trees of Western Iraq. This was a lie.

    -Powell claimed the Iraqis had 2,245 gallons of Anthrax. This was a lie.

    -Powell claimed Iraq had four tons of VX nerve gas. The UN had ALREADY confirmed that it had been destroyed.

    -Powell claimed Iraq was building long-range drones designed to carry biological weapons. This was a lie.

    -Powell claimed Iraq had 100-500 tons of chemical and biological warfare agents. This was a bald-faced lie.

    -Powell claimed Saddam had authorized his field commanders to use biological weapons. No such weapons were ever used by the Iraqis to defend against the U.S. invasion and none was ever found in Iraq.

    -Powell claimed 122mm warheads found by UN inspectors were chemical weapons, but in fact the empty warheads showed no signs of ever having contained chemical weapons.

    -Powell claimed Iraq had a secret force of illegal long-range Scud missiles. This was a lie.

    -Powell claimed to have an audio tape that proved Saddam backed Osama Bin Laden. Independent translation revealed it actually contained Osama's wish for Saddam's death.

    And for anyone not yet convinced that Powell's presentation to the UN was composed of deliberate falsehoods, consider that he also submitted aerial spy photos allegedly showing laboratories and storage areas for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction. Not only were all those sites later found to be harmless, but in at least one case, the satellite Powell claimed had taken one of the pictures had actually been out of operation at the time.

    The point is that no bullshit that Bill Clinton may have flung during his presidency came within a country mile of the deliberate menu of lies that Colin Powell fed the world on Feb. 5, 2003 on direct orders of his master, George W. Bush.

    Rat Pack and Jiminy's attempt to establish equivalency between the two is every bit as dishonest as rightoids can always be expected to be.

    (But lest anyone suffer misapprehension . . . Remember that Clinton was no liberal.)

    ReplyDelete
  57. Excerpt from a statement to the UN by Dr Hans Blix :"While in most cases issues are outstanding because there is a lack of supporting evidence, in a few cases, there is information in our possession that would appear to contradict Iraq's account. At this point, I will only mention that there are indications suggesting that Iraq's account of its production and unilateral destruction of anthrax during the period between 1988 and 1991, may not be accurate. On this matter, we shall certainly ask Iraq to provide explanations and further evidence"

    Which of course, Iraq did not provide.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Ivan (Stewie Griffin) you're a pathetic excuse for an almost human being. The fact that Powel actual went point by point is only because Clinton was too stupid to. If it didn't have boobs he didn't want to do much with it. Go ahead and defend the dirtbag rapist. We expect that of you leftoid murdering scum buckets.
    Where should I send the ticket, I need your contact info.

    ReplyDelete