In response, Obama is expected to make more frequent use of executive orders, vetoes, signing statements and policy initiatives that originate within the federal agencies to maneuver around congressional Republicans who are threatening to derail initiatives he has already put in place, including health care reforms, and to launch serial investigations into his administration's spending."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
When have we EVER seen such bullshit within our government? NEVER! The leftists had cows over Nixon's actions but are as quiet as church mice here. The Founding Fathers would NEVER have agreed to rule by Executive Orders and bypassing the Congress/Senate. If this was Bush 43 doing this, the Left would, as the Gunny stated yesterday, "unraveled like a roll of sh*tpaper in a tornado."
Obama and his minions are THE MOST CORRUPT inhabitants of OUR government ever. For example, Obama is now considering a corruptocrat from Chicago, one clown named William Daley, relative of the corruptocratic Chicago family, that helped rig the 1960 election for JFK (with a payoff from Joe Sr.), for a position in his sordid Admin. The Gunny bets that he'll replace the corrupt and tyrannical Rahmbutt the Ballerina. What a joke this group is. Wait, more like a nightmare.
Oddly enough, a week or so ago, the Gunny discussed this very thing, Comrade Obama ruling by fiat. He is getting his marching orders from the Center for American Progress and the fetid brain of Podesta, all financed by, naturally, the owner and operator of the DNC, Soros.
Oh, and in Europe, they're seizing private pension funds:
EXCERPT: "People’s retirement savings are a convenient source of revenue for governments that don’t want to reduce spending or make privatizations. As most pension schemes in Europe are organised by the state, European ministers of finance have a facilitated access to the savings accumulated there, and it is only logical that they try to get a hold of this money for their own ends. In recent weeks I have noted five such attempts."
And since the libs have introduced legislation to do the same thing, one wonders, will our very own dictator simply sign an Executive Order to make it happen? After all, The One, "won", and we all know how the Community Organizer-in-Chief feels about redistributing OPM.
Oh, and it appears that the Community Organizer-in-Chief is busy seizing land.
"An Obama administration directive designed to preserve more public lands as wilderness is stirring anger in the West, where ranchers, sportsmen and energy companies say they could lose access to acreage they count on for their recreation and livelihood.
The regulatory change … directs the Bureau of Land Management to survey its vast holdings stretching between Alaska, Arizona, California and Colorado, in search of unspoiled back country. The agency can then designate these tracts — potentially millions of acres — as "wild lands."
THE HEAD PARASITE BUSY AT WORK
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/01/william-daley-obama-white-house.html
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/The-Adam-Smith-Institute-Blog/2011/0102/European-nations-begin-seizing-private-pensions
http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/white-house/2011/01/obama-ready-deploy-executive-powers-against-gop-hill#ixzz1A5avliqB
I guess Teddy Roosevelt is mostly responsible for the government land grab.
ReplyDeleteThe thing I don't understand is why the states don't tell the feds to go back to DC and stay there....and to butt a stump on the way.
It seems the state governments have programmed acquiescence to all federal government fiats.
Maybe they have stored memory of how the federal government treated states' rights in 1861...
This is a great post Gunny!!
ReplyDeleteThis man so much wants to be a dictator. He loves the idea of being cow towed to. Of being able to vacation slothfully, while by merely speaking, "make it so", and it is a law.
I loved the picture of O in his true image of the vampire!! (snicker)
Buck,
ReplyDeleteNo lie.
What is so aggravating is that they are seizing land that has vital resources on them that they then prevent from being USED BY THE NATION!
Nanna,
ReplyDeleteThanks. Did you see the picture of the idiot on Drudge, standing there in flip flops like some skid row bum.
And the Left wonders why we and foreign leaders have no respect for him.
Gunny,
ReplyDeleteYup, I saw the picture. He doesn't look like any president I've seen before.
Poor Obama, it's so hard to ba a god.....
ReplyDeleteJim,
ReplyDeleteYep, he tries so hard to rule our lives.
I have to agree with Buck. All these state governors afraid of the cocksuckers in D.C. or what? Gotta be the threat of withheld fed funds. As always,follow the money.
ReplyDeleteClyde,
ReplyDeleteBut if they broke from the Feds and utilized their resources, they could tell the feds to pound sand. They'd likely rake in more revenue.
I'm watching Gov Parnell pussy out right now. Sad to see.
Hey, I live in CT, just goes to show ya' what an armpit this State has become. No federal land grab here, who the heck would want it?
ReplyDeleteAs always, The Gunster's post is full of lies and quite astonishing examples of rank hypocrisy.
ReplyDeleteCase in point:
Gunny warns darkly that President Barack Hussein Obama "is expected to make more frequent use of executive orders, vetoes, signing statements and policy initiatives [...] to maneuver around congressional Republicans who are threatening to derail initiatives he has already put in place. . ."
The first thing that comes to mind is, why shouldn't he, faced as he is by an amoral gang of Republican obstructionists who have publicly vowed to mindlessly and undemocratically oppose every single presidential initiative, regardless of how Congressional gridlock and the resulting inability of Washington to govern harms the nation?
It's hilarious that among those actions Gunny cites as allegedly "dictatorial" are those "signing statements" that are (unfortunately) used by presidents to signal that they intend to ignore or try to negate a law passed by Congress. It was during the (Republican) Reagan administration that those statements began to be used for that purpose. No president used them more wantonly than the Repuglican George W. Bush, who, as of January 30, 2008, had signed 157 signing statements challenging over 1,100 provisions of federal law.
(BTW, the rise in signing statements use by Reagan coincided with the writing by Samuel Alito -- at the time a staff attorney in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel -- of a 1986 memorandum making the case for "interpretive signing statements" as a tool to "increase the power of the Executive to shape the law." As a reward, Alito was placed on the Supreme Court by the first Bush to infest the White House.)
And speaking of pure absurdity, the Gunster blathers that
>. . .it appears that the Community
>Organizer-in-Chief
>is busy seizing land.
Except, of course, that Obama isn't seizing anything, and as far as the federal government doing so, it's not possible to "seize" ONE'S OWN land.
>directs the Bureau of Land Management
>to survey its vast holdings [...]
>in search of unspoiled back country.
>The agency can then designate these tracts — >potentially millions of acres — as "wild >lands."
Yes, the agency is perfectly within its legal and moral rights to survey 'ITS' vast holdings and designate them any way it wants.
There you have it -- more ridiculous rumor mongering and dishonest alarm-raising by liar-in-chief Gunny, who evidently knows most of you tools here are brainwashed enough to believe anything he says.
My advice is, don't.
Ivan,
ReplyDeleteGOP Obstructionists?
Didn't the Kenyan Usurper have a MAJORITY in the Kongress and one in the Senate from the time he illegally took office to NOW!?
Another great post Stewie. /sarc
Just a minor correction,Ivan. It was the second Bush dimwit who put Alito on the bench.
ReplyDeletePoorly edjamacated Stewie Griffin!
ReplyDelete"The first thing that comes to mind is, why shouldn't he, faced as he is by an amoral gang of Republican obstructionists who have publicly vowed to mindlessly and undemocratically oppose every single presidential initiative, regardless of how Congressional gridlock and the resulting inability of Washington to govern harms the nation?"
First, you can not use "an" and "a", as well as other incorrect words and terms. Since all of us here have and unducation well above your Pre-K level, allow us to assist you.
It should read as such;
"The first thing that comes to mind is, why shouldn't he, faced as he is by a moral gang of Republican obstructionists who have publicly vowed to mindfully and patriotically oppose every single Marxist initiative, regardless of how Congressional gridlock and the resulting inability of Washington to govern spares the nation?"
Oh and Stewie, did anyone ever explain to you that WE are the government and it works for US?