Saturday, December 10, 2011

FOIA MAY WELL SAVE THE REPUBLIC

WHODA THUNK IT?

The Law of unintended consequences takes over and FOIA becomes a warrior for the Republic in exposing liars, crooks, and Democrats, but the Gunny digresses.

It appears that warrior for the Republic Mark Levin and the Landmark Legal Foundation, are taking the fight to the Regime AND WINNING. Using FOIA, they have uncovered the fact that a fat liberal idiot, unqualified to work in small claims court, now appointed to the SCOTUS by Obama and a Dem-controlled Senate, was involved in DOJ's legal response to legal attacks on ObummerKare, as to its unconstitutionality! It appears that Kagan bleated to the corrupt DOJ that Levin and the LLF were using a rule to fight it if the House "deemed" ObummerKare was passed, like the Nutsy Pelosi Kongress did with spending and the budget, back when they actually had one. (Now the Dems consistently block the GOP's issuance of a budget)

The crux of the issue is this, Kagan lied to the Senate during her confirmation process.

She was asked by the Senate if she had commented on or worked on or viewed the proposed ObummerKare legislation or any issues resulting from said legislation.

She stated "no" everytime.

1.  Kagan, as Solicitor General, emailed acting Office of Legal Counsel Chief David Barron and had in the subject line: "Health care q" [health care question] with the following question in the message: "Did you seee [sic] michael mcConnell piece in the wsj?" Barron responded: "YES—HE IS GETTING IT GOING."

2.  Katyal extended [an ObummerKare] email chain letter by answering to someone named Perrelli and cc'ing one Elena Kagan, his boss, on March 18, 2010, The email discussed Mark Levin's and the Landmark Legal Foundation's draft reply against the pending ObummerKare law.

Subj: "RE: Health Care."
Text: "Tom, I was just looking at the draft complaint by Landmark Legal Foundation. It
 is clearly written to be filed when the House approves the reconciliation bill and before the President signs it. See paras 15-17."

No doubt Kagan read it.

In addition, the DOJ has tried to redact much of the email traffic that would expose the perfidy of a corrupt regime trying to force more unconstitutional crap down our throats in order to cover their asses. And with the ass the size of Kagan's, they're gonna need A LOT of cover!

In 28 U.S.C 455, it states: (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. (b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:

(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;

(2) Where in private practice he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it;

(3) Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy.

If Kagan refuses to recuse herself, she should be IMPEACHED! For LYING UNDER OATH to the Senate during her confirmation hearing, she should ALREADY HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED!

UPDATE: KAGAN RECUSES

12/12/2011


http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2011/12/obamacare-recusal/
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/28/I/21/455

6 comments:

  1. Be nice to see that,but O'asshole STILL has the replacement for the twit. Hitlary! on the SCOTUS replacing Kagan should hell freeze over,and the damnable r's grow a set,and demand her removal? Gets her out of dickhead's way for the '12 run. AND he still has a "friendly" court.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Billy Cigar Clinton lied to a Grand Jury and he was patted on the back...as he tried like hell to get the stain off that dress! As Capt. Kirk would say, "Where no cigar has ever gone before."

    Zero,nothing,zip,nada,no one in DC gives a f*ck; will happen to Kagencommie! The lib's get away with this shit all the time. The SCOTUS is now just another Obuma SCROTUM for the left to stick it to us.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Who's gonna impeach Kagan? There ain't a republican on the hill who has the balls to demand the Kenyan squatter be removed for ineligibility, where they gonna find enough cojones to tackle this?

    BTW, LOVE you blog, Gunny. Was turned on to it by a friend recently.

    ReplyDelete
  4. She'll pull the same shit all of these politicians pull when confronted with the truth - she'll develop a case of amnesia or just flat lie. If Eric "Stedman" Holder can do it why not Kagan. And the sad thing is the American public has become so accustomed to being lied to they won't demand any accountability.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As Stewie Griffin would say, "And what have we learned here, hmmm?"
    The bedrock of freedom survives not on who occupies the Oval Office but who controls the congress. For without advise and consent such socialist jurists can be installed at the Oval Office's whim.
    Even with Senate approval things go wrong vis Sandra Day O'Conner...

    ReplyDelete
  6. buck,

    Dead on bro! It may be more important for us to win back the senate in 2012 than the WH!

    ReplyDelete