"Banning guns is an idea whose time has come." Senator Biden (D-DE)
Even better is the one from Dianne "MILCON Scandal" Feinstein, who herself has a carry conceal permit from the People’s Republik of Kalifornia, (the commoners can’t get one though):
"The National Guard fulfills the militia mentioned in the Second Amendment. Citizens no longer need to protect the state or themselves." Senator Feinstein (D-CA)
Disregarding the fact that the SCOTUS has ruled time and again that the police are NOT there for the protection of the individual, Feinstein clearly has her head up her ass, as do liberals in general, concerning the Constitution and firearms in particular (amongst many other things).
Can it be that liberals start every single day with a clean slate of history? If so, one really has to question the agenda that liberals have when it comes to gun confiscation and illegal gun bans. The point being that liberals seriously could not learn a lesson from history even if we whacked them over the head with it. For example, in 1911, Turkey implemented gun control, collected the weapons of the minority-Armenian population, and in four short years, murdered 1.5 million Armenians. That is, after rounding them up like cattle. And who can forget the country that liberal NY Times writer Walter Duranty claimed was a paradise, the USSR, which implemented gun control and proceeded to murder over 20 MILLION dead (1929-1953). That's about 833K murdered a year. In fact in EVERY genocide, a gun ban was first implemented, i.e., Germany, China, Cambodia, Rwanda, Guatemala, and Uganda, with over 34 million people being exterminated without the ability to fire a shot in self-defense. (That probably has John “Kill Em All” Holdren all hot and bothered just thinking about it.)
Perhaps the most startling quote is from the leader of the left-wing National Sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei or Nazi’s for short:
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing." Adolf Hitler
Do liberals see us as subjects? If so, the Gunny sees THEM as the enemy to be crushed.
When we see behind the mask of the SCOTUS, as Ass Judge Breyer showed us, it is time to ask ourselves a few questions about our lawmakers and more importantly, how WE are faced with violent crime, crime that our so-called leaders would have us face UNARMED!
1. If the Feds were to completely ban firearms, do you think that this will lessen or increase the amount of armed criminals in America?
2. Why are the rich elites (pols too) allowed to have armed bodyguards yet many of us cannot legally carry a firearm for protection? Are their lives more important than anyone else's?
3. If criminals prefer a firearm to commit crimes with, is there any reason that they are no good enough for personal protection or home defense?
4. Why do Democrats want to be the only ones with weapons? Do they think we're too dumb to possess them?
5. There are 22,000+ gun laws on the books (BATF) yet criminals are still using them. So why does gun crime still exist with all of these laws?
6. Why was NYC Mayor Bloomberg allowed to perform strawman buys in various states and not be charged by the BATF?
Once again libs, here is the Second Amendment in case you forgot it: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Now there is absolutely no ambiguity in this Amendment other than what liberals try to muddy the waters with. Very succinctly, our Founding Fathers stated, keep your frigging hands off of the people's guns. Moreover, the words SHALL NOT, do not mean, maybe, or, could be, they mean NO! STOP! CEASE AND DESIST! Moreover, the word "infringed" is also starkly clear. The word, "infringed", in Websters is defined as:
"to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another."
As in, libs, quit infringing on my civil liberties and personal freedoms.
Thus, it can be clearly stated with a great deal of truth that our Founding Fathers expected the Federal Government NOT to create ANY LAW that violated the right of free men and women to keep and bear arms. Period.
Terrorists, criminals, and liberals have one common trait and that is that they are motivated by opportunity. All of these gangsters seek to attack soft targets like houses without a firearm in them, people unarmed by the law, people's paychecks, our wallets, etc. When the do-gooders, i.e., liberals and RINOs work overtime to reduce our ability to arm ourselves, it provides felons more opportunities to hit soft targets. Again, it must be noted that liberals have a hard-time understanding and assimilating factual data as the high-crime cities are ALWAYS those run by liberals and who have the most restrictive gun control laws. The same laws that criminals, unbelievably so, choose to ignore! Odd huh? Criminals ignoring laws? Whoda thunk it?
In summation, it's way past the time for us common Americans to demand that the Constitution be left as it was written, not as these dumbass liberals WANT to interpret it (in order to comply with their agenda). Does not the single woman rate to protect herself as much as Senator Feinstein does? It is time for Americans to THINK about what they are doing when they yank the lever in November 2012. Will YOU be one of the one's responsible for putting a gun-grabber into office? Will YOU be responsible for putting an anti-gun sympathizing RINO into office? Remember the lesson of history in that, once guns are gone, it is just a matter of time until lives are lost, usually in a wholesale slaughter.
"Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." John Adams
"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion." Imam Obama