Friday, May 21, 2010


This is from the Oath Keepers, a group the Gunny PROUDLY belongs to.

Let us remember that the WORST part of Katrina wasn't Ray "Chocolate City" Nagin's incompetence or the abject stupidity of Governor Bonehead Blanco, OR Bush 43's idiocy in sending monumental piles of OPM (Other People's Money) simply to preserve a welfare city and the corruption of New Orleans, bu it was the thugs from the SUPER CORRUPT NOPD and some scumbags in uniform, who went door to door, confiscating the guns of Americans citizens. Guns that they may have needed to protect themselves from the looting, raping, robbery of your basic Democrat voter base, especially since the NOPD was out looting as well.

HOWEVER, it was not all doom and gloom then and in a story the Lapdog media REFUSED to run, National Guard Staff Sgt. Joshua May and his fellow soldiers, REFUSED to violate the Second Amendment right of American citizens to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS and confiscate firearms! BRAVO ZULU to them.

Not everyone in the US military will fall under the spell of Obum-Phuck and follow the orders of Obamunism, when we finally get to Obum-Phuck's Reichstag moment. WE WILL, support and defend the CONSTITUTION of the United States of America, NOT the Thug-in-Chief and his rancid Anti-American claptrap. May God ensure that we make it to the end of the Hopey/Changey nightmare without having to test the Oath Keepers' principles. The radical Class of 1968 Alinskites, using their Cloward-Piven techniques, now control the federal government. Rest assured, in fact, bet on it, that their policies ARE deliberately intended to produce chaos in America, either through a financial collapse and/or a major terrorist attack that will kill and maim thousands of us. After all, Rahmbutt "Deadfish" Emasculated says, "you can't let a good crisis go to waste."

Who cares about the suffering of Americans? Not the Dummycrats or the Kenyan Usurper.


  1. Good piece,but one small error. Chocolate Ray,the Inept,was mayor,the INCOMPETENT Blanco was governor of Louisiana at the time. Better I point it out than Ivan,eh? bwahahahahaha

  2. Every swinging d that put on a uniform took that oath.
    "...against all enemies foreign and domestic..."
    Foreign and DOMESTIC!
    Where are they?
    Right now the Officer Corps could act to Protect and Defend. Where are they?
    Even the alphabet agencies take that oath.
    When do they question the constitutionality of a law when they batter down another door?
    Why do they feel the need to wear a ski mask when battering down that door?
    Too bad all the Oath Keepers are on the outside looking in.

  3. damn straight Gunny! that is waht obambie and gang are scared of. that is the only reason they havent tried an outright takeover. i hear tell that some politician is proposing to do away with our beloved Corps again. who do you think the leftist scumbags fear the most?

  4. Clyde,

    Good eye. I wrote it on the fly and did not proofread it. BZ.

  5. Buck,

    A lot of truth in your post but I am optimistic. Americans ALWAYS have to wait until it's ALMOST too late to act, and then we do, and then we go over the top on it. IMHO, the liberals DO NOT have the backing of the US military and THEY KNOW IT. Why else would Comrade Obum-Phuck need a civilian national security force?

  6. usmcpgw,

    They CANNOT get rid of the Corps because we were created by law and if they even tried it, the American people would have a FIT! Not to mention about 500K or so of us Devil Dogs marching on DC.

    You find out the name of that puke, lemme know.

  7. I'd like to thank Staff Sgt May, his fellow guardsmen, all the other Oath Keepers and you Gunny for standing up for our rights and taking your oath seriously.

    "Watch what people are cynical about, and one can often discover what they lack." George S Patton

  8. Gunny the post seems to have disappeared. this is all i could find of what is left.

    The U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, retired Army Gen. Karl Eikenberry, reportedly made a comment about there being 41 nations serving in Afghanistan - and a 42nd composed of the Marine Corps. One unnamed Obama administration official was quoted by The Washington Post as saying, "We have better operational coherence with virtually all of our NATO allies than we have with the U.S. Marine Corps."

    earlier it had the name of the person who was making the proposal. seems the internet can be edited.

  9. rikdergis,

    Thanks but WE are all ONE TEAM. We have a plan of attack on this, the wherewithal to fight it, and the shining examples from our Founders and people like Ronaldus Magnum, WFB, Charlton Heston, etc.

    My motto is: "One Team, One Fight," and ANYONE on our side is a patriot.

  10. usmcpgw,

    THANK GOD for our Corps. Our motto sums it up:

    Semper Fidelis.

    I PRAY that they continue to buck this corrupt thugocracy in DC. Crime Inc.

  11. The ever-dishonest Gunster blathered:

    >Not everyone in the US military
    >will fall under the spell of
    >Obum-Phuck and follow the orders
    >of Obamunism

    The gun-confiscation order (if there actually was one) was made under the Repuglican Bush administration.

    There hasn't been a shred of evidence that the adminstration of President Barack Hussein Obama has the slightest intention of confiscating citizens' firearms or limiting firearms ownership.

    Once again, Gunsel tries his damndest to panic his loyal followers with lies and hysteria.

    Ho, hum. Another day, another Gunster lie.

  12. Dated ,but obama has taken anti-gun stances

  13. Another attempt by "Obama staff"

    Attempted legislation shows state of mind.

  14. At 15:24, Rat Pack lied:

    >obama has taken anti-gun stances

    No he hasn't, unless you're an NRA fanatic -- IOW, an utter jackass -- and believe any measure to control the unfettered proliferation of firearms, including to children, the criminal and crazy, is "anti-gun."

    "We can have reasonable, thoughtful gun control measure that I think respect the Second Amendment and people’s traditions." -Barack Hussein Obama.

    THAT is "anti-gun?" If so, it's a view shared by the vast majority of Americans.

    Stop lying. Grow up.

  15. Ivan, you demonstate your twisting of other's positions.
    The NRA is against guns in the hands of unsupervised children, criminals and the mentally unstable.

    Guns in the hands of "children, the criminal and crazy" is already against the law, as is possession in bars. The laws are already there, but enforcement is lax, as in the case of Mayor Daley threatening a reporter during a news conference (ie what if I stuck......)

    But then telling the whole stoty has never been your forte, Ivan. Bloviating is morw your atyle.

  16. Obama "Opposed bill okaying illegal gun use in home invasions
    Hale DeMar, a 52-year-old Wilmette resident, was arrested and charged with misdemeanor violations for shooting, in the shoulder and leg, a burglar who broke into his home not once, but twice. Cook County prosecutors dropped all charges against DeMar.
    In March 2004, the Illinois Senate passed Senate Bill 2165, a law introduced in response to DeMar's case, with provisions designed to assert a right of citizens to protect themselves against home invasions, such that self-defense requirements would be viewed to take precedence over local ordinances against handgun possession. The measure passed the Illinois Senate by a vote of 38-20. Barack Obama was one of the 20 state senators voting against the measure.

    Governor Rod Blagojevich vetoed the bill. On Nov. 9, 2004, the Illinois Senate voted 40-18 to override Blagojevich's veto. Again, Obama acted against the bill.

    On Nov. 17, the Illinois House voted overwhelmingly, 85-30, to override the governor's veto and Senate Bill 2165 became law"

    Read it

  17. obama keeping everyone , left and right, in dark

  18. We can have reasonable, thoughtful gun control measure that I think respect the Second Amendment and people’s traditions."
    -Barack Hinsein Obama.
    Ivan loves the word control, that's code word for Marxist oppression. He so badly wants to be sent to a Gulag and become someone prison biatch.

  19. At 11:16, Rack Pat propagandized:

    >The NRA is against guns in
    >the hands of unsupervised
    >children, criminals and the
    >mentally unstable.

    So is everybody.

    But the NRA is also against any regulation that would KEEP GUNS OUT OF THE HANDS of children, criminals and the mentally unstable.

    Which makes that organization the world's undisputed poster boy for organizational hypocrisy, enjoying credibility only with right-wing fanatics such as yourself, the firearms industry and, of course, the mentally unstable.

    And, BTW, the refusal by Obama and some other Illinois legislators to sanction the possession of an illegally owned weapon simply because that weapon happened to be used in self-defence is hardly "anti-gun."

    It is "anti-insanity" -- something I realize you and the wretched Gunster know nothing about.

  20. At 13:47, Pack Rodent posted a link that produced this:

    TemplateSyntaxError at /news/2010/may/22/senators-obama-admin-keeps-congress-dark-intel/

    Caught IOError while rendering: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/nfs-media/twt/assets/image/2008/05/14/20080514-164057-pic-658063758.jpg'

    And what the ever-dishonest Rodent fails to tell the gullible, of course, is that the Washington Times isn't a newspaper in the usual sense of the word. It's a right-wing propaganda sheet wholly owned and operated by the wacko South Korean Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church.

    You know Moon, don't you? He's the self-styled second coming of Christ who's become a laughingstock for "marrying" thousands of followers in huge ceremonies in sports stadia.

    He's also a convicted tax evader who served time in the U.S.

    The point is that citing the almost universally ignored Washington Times as a credible source of political news is tantamount to citing The Daily Worker.

    Thanks again, Rat, for your eternal dishonesty and continuing efforts to help Gunsel mislead his society of loyal suckers.

    You folks are so damn dumb. . . .

  21. Where to start? Educating the "boy genius".

    Current law:GCA 1986; who can not buy a weapon
    Anyone who has been convicted in a federal court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, excluding crimes of imprisonment that are related to the regulation of business practices.
    Anyone who has been convicted in a state court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding two years, excluding crimes of imprisonment that are related to the regulation of business practices.
    Anyone who is a fugitive from justice.
    Anyone who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.
    Anyone who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to a mental institution.
    Any alien illegally or unlawfully in the United States or an alien admitted to the United States under a non-immigrant visa. Aliens who have a tourist visa or student visa may possess guns if they have a current, valid hunting license.
    Anyone who has been discharged under dishonorable conditions from the United States armed forces.
    Anyone who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his or her citizenship.
    Anyone that is subject to a court order that restrains the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of such intimate partner. (added 1996)
    Anyone who has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence (added in 1996 by the Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban, or "Lautenberg Amendment.")
    Additionally, 18 USC 922(x) generally prohibits persons under 18 from possessing handguns or handgun ammunition with certain exceptions for employment, target practice, education, and a handgun possessed while defending the home of the juvenile or a home in which they are an invited guest.[1]

    A person who is under indictment or information for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year cannot lawfully receive a firearm. Such person may continue to lawfully possess firearms obtained prior to the indictment or information.

    NRA and safety; They teach rather than talk to include kids
    rearm Safety

    NRA’s 63,000 Certified Instructors and 11,000 Law Enforcement Instructors reach over 800,000 people annually. NRA’s Eddie Eagle GunSafe® Program has been used by more than 26,000 schools, law enforcement agencies, and civic groups to reach more than 23 million children since 1988. The accidental gun death rate has declined 94% since 1904

    But then as a Brady lover, you would rather repeat old canardsw.

  22. Ivan displays his incompetence
    "TemplateSyntaxError at /news/2010/may/22/senators-obama-admin-keeps-congress-dark-intel/

    Caught IOError while rendering: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/nfs-media/twt/assets/image/2008/05/14/20080514-164057-pic-658063758.jpeg'"
    I checked it, works fine if you can cut and paste to IE.

  23. I see Ivan attacked the source of the story, but offered no rebuttal.
    Remember the National Enquirer had it right on Edwards and his "love child".

  24. At 19:45, Pack Rat plunged into pure irrelevance and babbled:

    >Remember the National Enquirer
    >had it right on Edwards and his
    >"love child".

    But we're not talking about the National Enquirer.

    >I see Ivan attacked the source
    >of the story

    When a source is as completely discredited as the Washington Times has been, there IS NO story.

    You've been busted for once again trying to pull the wool over the eyes of Gunny's Gullible Goofs.

    You must really treasure those private e-mails from Gunsel, virtually patting you on your little pointy head.

  25. Ivan
    the point which you were unable/unwilling to grasp is that even "discredited sources" can find true accurate stories like National Enquirer's story on John Edwards.
    Prove the Washington Times isn't true.

    You've been busted again deflecting because you have no case.

  26. At 5:56, Rack Pat gibbered:

    >Prove the Washington Times isn't true.

    Prove the Daily Worker doesn't have it right.

  27. can't do it ,huh, ivan?

    daily worker your primary source?

  28. where do you get your copies?
    the time tunnel?