THANK YOU FOIA!
That Comrde Zero was a red diaper baby comes as no surprise to us. WE, who did our due diligence prior to voting, KNEW that Obummer was a commie son of a b*tch.
We KNEW that his mentor as a young child was the child-molesting, drug-dealing communist Frank Marshall Davis.
We KNEW that like many of Obama's friends today, Davis was so radical that the non politically correct FBI of the 50's-60's had Davis on a list of traitors who were in the commie party and dedicated to the overthrow the US government.
We KNEW that Barry was was hooked up with Communist radical Davis by his grandfather Stanley Dunham after his African communist father and hippie dirtbag mother abandoned him.
But THANKS to FOIA, we find out now that the FBI was keeping tabs on Gramps Dunham too:
"The FBI confirms that a file was maintained on Obama's grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham. This is a troubling development in the effort to understand the Marxism that drives Obama's policies as president today." Cliff Kincaid, the journalist who runs the public policy group, America's Survival, Inc. (ASI).
Dubbed "Gramps" by Obama, it was "Gramps" that Obama said liberated Auschwitz. We laughed at Barry's stupidity but maybe Gramps DID serve with the Red Army, only not in traditional ways. After all, it was Gramps who hung with Communist Party USA (CPUSA) member Frank Marshall Davis, drinking and smoking dope. Davis, a commie pornographer (he wrote a semi-biographical novel about having sex with a 13-year-old girl) mentored Obama for up to nine YEARS in Hawaii. Dunham picked Davis as a mentor for Obama because he thought Barry needed a black role model. That speaks volumns for the judgement of Gramps who turned Barry over to a commie pervert for moral guidance.
The 600-page FBI file on Davis was posted at usasurvival.org. It shows that Davis was a key high-level operative in a Soviet-sponsored network in Hawaii. One has to wonder if Gramps was merely a useful idiot or something else. Thanks to the Freedom of Information Act, we have the file on Comrade Zero's mentor, Frank Marshall Davis. It's not a quantum leap to figure out where the hatrd of America, inside of Comrade Zero, comes from. Nine YEARS with Frank. Twenty YEARS with Reverend Wright. Twenty-nine YEARS of anti-American hatred instilled in an empty suit. No wonder he and Soros fit together so well.
Too bad the Lapdog Media failed to do the proper vetting, that they USED to do way back when. To the poltroons on the left, all they needed or wanted to know was that Comrade Zero was a rabid left-winger who hates America and all it stands for, just like they do.
That's it, to the Gulag with you! You have done it now, the Obama secret police are on their way.
ReplyDeleteSUMMIT ENDORSES OBAMA GOAL ON NUCLEAR SECURITY
ReplyDelete"WASHINGTON (AP)– In full accord on a global threat, world leaders Tuesday endorsed President Barack Obama's call for securing all nuclear materials around the globe within four years to keep them out of the grasp of terrorists."
---
As I said in another thread . . . thank the stars that America once again has a man of obvious ability and stature as president . . . a man other national leaders can accept as -- at least -- an equal, a man who doesn't come off as an ignorant, half-bright embarrassment like George W. Bush, or a pathetic, doddering demento like Ronald Reagan.
As a world-leading nation, America is back, folks.
Obama! How can anyone not like him?
Quite easily thank you very much!!!
ReplyDeleteStewie, He folded like a pussy! That's no man, he's just another Marxist liar that conned America deeper into government oppression. He got taken to the cleaners by the Russians and he's to stupid to know it.
ReplyDeleteIt becomes easier every day the asshat sells the country further out to not like him.
ReplyDeleteObama's popularity continues to plummet. Gunny points out more reasons why not to trust this man as the president of the United States. He's only a one term president, and liberals will be out for years to come. It's too bad they've already done as much damage as they have done.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, during Obama's previous speech, was it Ivan under the podium I saw?
That's not funny Eric, Ivan is all man. I've hardly ever seen him do things like that. What ever they dish out, he can take. Do you want me to dress like a black man again Ivan?
ReplyDelete"We KNEW that his mentor as a young child was the child-molesting, drug-dealing communist Frank Marshall Davis"?
ReplyDeleteHow do you KNOW:
1. Davis was his mentor?
2. Davis was a child-molester?
3. Davis dealt drugs?
Do you have any actual proof of these claims, or do you KNOW them like people KNEW Iraq was responsible for 9/11? Misrepresenting speculation as fact is dishonest. Rumors and speculation are not knowledge. As they say on CSI: "Follow the evidence!"
KK-
ReplyDeleteSeriously? Go read the FOIA released info. You people are such tools. God help you when it really comes down.
The lapdog media commie SOB's did know Gunny. osamabinobama the NGNMFer commie muslim worst POS in the world is just their cup of horse manure.
ReplyDeleteTheir osamaone is nothing but all enemy to the USA.
davis the mentor
ReplyDeletedavis's mentoring of obama consisted of;
women have two teats and men have three. suck my third teat and get nutritous protien. so obambie gayfully obeyed. ivan is just jealous that his mentors third teat was shrivelled.
hey ivan,
ReplyDeleteyour mentor, jason levin, is calling.
KK,
ReplyDeleteNee answered it well. Do you have a comprehension problem?
The FOIA released info "shows that Davis was a key high-level operative in a Soviet-sponsored network in Hawaii." It does NOT show Davis was his mentor, Davis was a child-molester, or that Davis dealt drugs.
ReplyDeleteEvidently, your "knowledge" of these claims, derived from the FOIA file, does not exist. To misrepresent such speculation as fact is dishonest. It's a pity that estates of the deceased cannot sue for slander in the United States.
"Truth is generally the best vindication against slander." - Abraham Lincoln
KK,
ReplyDeletetry this for info:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/2601914/Frank-Marshall-Davis-alleged-Communist-was-early-influence-on-Barack-Obama.html
note that "Frank" was mentioned several times
ReplyDeleteAlthough the "mentor" claim can go either way, that telegraph.uk article does not claim that Davis dealt drugs or was a child molester. It only claims that Davis confirmed writing a semi-autobiographical novel, in which imaginary character Bob Greene has sex with an underage teen. Nowhere does Davis say those events happened in his own life.
ReplyDeleteIs there any empirical evidence, such as court records or confirmatory statements from Davis himself? A novel is fiction, and a questionable source for such accusations! Do you also consider the author of porn memoir-novel "Lolita" to be a child molester, or just Davis?
The issue is rather simple: Either you literally attribute fictional characters' stories to their authors' real lives, or you accept that fictional characters' stories are fiction. By definition, even semiautobiographical novels are fictionalized accounts of their authors' own lives. Research should reveal that ALL fictional narrators of such novels claim the events are true, although their actual authors make no such claims!
"Have patience awhile; slanders are not long-lived. Truth is the child of time; erelong she shall appear to vindicate thee."
- Immanuel Kant
"By definition, even semiautobiographical novels are fictionalized accounts of their authors' own lives. "
ReplyDeleteTrue, but what part is fiction and what part is fact?
I don't know. but there is reason for suspicion. People believed worse about Bush with less information.
There is irrefutable evidence that Bush used trumped-up evidence against Iraq. There is also irrefutable evidence that unscrupulous "journalists" used trumped-up evidence against Davis, including misrepresenting fiction as fact.
ReplyDeleteIn the absence of compelling evidence, nothing in memoir-novels should be literally attributed to anyone. Do you believe that some portions of "Fanny Hill" happened to author John Cleland, or that some portions of "Gulliver's Travels" happened to author Jonathan Swift?
To literally attribute fiction to its author when it suits one's agenda, yet to recognize the difference between fact and fiction in other cases, is intellectually dishonest.
Just curious why your blog is no longer at Town Hall. Did I miss something?
ReplyDelete