Friday, January 28, 2011


Yesterday, the Kenyan Usurper committed political suicide by throwing a bone to his far left hoplophobes by stating that he was going to push for gun control.

Could this be a link to the UN’s quest to remove our shooting-irons through the Hillary Clinton-backed UN Small Arms Treaty? Or is it simply Sir Golfsalot’s hatred of we bitter clingers of our guns and our bibles coming out?

The Left, my friends, NEVER EVER does ANYTHING without a plan for it was Sir Golfsalot who stated that he would, "back launching talks on a UN treaty to regulate arms sales/gun ban!" Oddly enough, not only is America’s first wannabe dictator backing this crapulence but a host of other repressive and hostile (to America) regimes are backing it: Iran, Cuba, Zimbabwe, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Syria, Vietnam, China, Burkina Faso, and others.

Strange that Obama backs the UN Small Arms Treaty and then uses the Giffords/Roll shooting as a sop to his kool-aid drinkers, or is it? After all, and this needs to be on a sign hung around Barry’s neck, "they can never let a good crisis go to waste."

EXCERPT: "Two weeks ago, in another reversal of policy, the U.S. joined a nearly unanimous 153-1 U.N. vote to adopt a resolution setting out a timetable on the proposed Arms Trade Treaty, including a U.N. conference to produce a final accord in 2012."

What Obama, Hillary, the UN, the Leftists, and some other Marxist tyrants want is "a group of governmental experts to look into the feasibility, scope and draft parameters for a comprehensive, legally binding instrument establishing common international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional arms". (UN treaty words)

Now, in another part of the lib’s plan is the installation of two Obama hacks on the SCOTUS, both anti-gun, both anti free speech, Sotomayor and Kagan. Why? Because like Sir Golfsalot, they are anti Constitution and want to shove a progressive agenda down our throats. And because one case stands directly athwart their path:

In Marbury v Madison 1803, the SCOTUS ruled: "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." John Marshall (1803)

We have a 5-4 split on the SCOTUS over the illegal DC gun ban. What happens when it goes 4-5 AGAINST US? We can thank a few RINOs for betraying us by endorsing Sotomayor and Kagan.

One of the reasons that they Gunny is so vociferously AGAINST the revision of history, for crap like political correctness is that we forget or gloss over the lessons of history. For example, during the 20th Century, in disarmed nations, i.e., USSR, China, Nazi Germany, Cambodia, Rwanda, Uganda, North Korea, etc, over 260 MILLION people were murdered by their government.

Indeed, Mexico has strict gun laws and they are overrun with drug cartel violence, the governments does little but hunker down, and the people are unarmed and powerless. Take that awesome Chicago gun ban for another example. It is an abject and total failure. The numbers clearly show that before the gun ban, Chicago's murder rate had been falling but after the ban took effect, in a circle jerk of liberal stupidity, Chicago's murder rate rose and in fact, FACTUAL NUMBERS show that in only TWO years out of the TWENTY-NINE years the ban has been in effect, has the murder rate been as low as pre-ban days. Moreover, in every city that prevents their law-abiding citizens of access to legally owned firearms, it in effect, turns the city over to the thugs, murderers, rapists, and drug dealers and indeed, the city becomes an ACCOMPLICE to these crimes. Thus, the defense of freedom, justice, and the defense of self is more heinous to liberals than the crimes the thugs perpetrate on innocent victims.

Again, and it cannot be said often enough, our Founding Fathers knew and said that a government that doesn't trust its citizens with the means of self-defense is not worthy of the trust of the citizenry. When we are disarmed, we are slaves. That is a FACT! Any gun ban only emboldens the criminals and makes the citizens victims. Dial 9-1-1 and hope. Is THAT the HOPE Sir Golfsalot has yammered about? BTW, before any liberals open up their sewerhole, FACTS show that after the illegal gun ban of DC was struck down, DC's murder rate dropped 25%! (Washington Times.)

The right to keep and bear arms is a God-given right and cannot be abolished by man. The CREATOR is the author of liberty, the granter of rights, the source of our FREEDOM; NOT the White House, not the State, not the UN, and NO human being on Earth for that matter! This is the Amendment that guards our freedom of speech, also under attack by the Left, and to allow Obama or ANY politician or activist to trample it is to sacrifice our freedom on the altar of abject liberalism!

Obama calls for more laws. Typical liberal pablum puked up by the Far Lefty himself. NO! What is needed is a fast trial, followed by a fast execution of sentence, with endless stays of execution, assisted by the Catholic Church (one reason why the Gunny left them), the ACLU, the SPLC, Liberals, etc, etc, ad nauseum. WHY are prisoners on Death Row there for 15, 20, THIRTY YEARS before they are removed from the society they attacked? WHY are we spending 50K-100K on MAXIMUM security for these vermin? WHY are we putting traitors like Hanssen, Ames, etc, into a prison for LIFE when the penalty for treason was, and SHOULD STILL BE, death. WHY was violent crime LOW in America in the early 20th century? Could it be that criminals feared "riding the lightning" in Ol’ Sparky? Could it be that swift justice was a DETERRENT to crime? Could it be that an avalanche of ambulance chasing lawyers has hijacked our criminal justice system and perverted it for their own gain, making our courts into revolving doors? How many paroled prisoners have escalated in crime, finally raping or murdering an innocent victim or shooting a police officer, and it is back to prison, on our dime. WHY are liberal’s still blaming society when it is starkly clear that it is the CRIMINAL’s fault and that they must be dealt with harshly, to protect society, not the criminal.

My friends, it is quite apparent to the Gunny that our rights are under attack by a group of anti-American liberals who care more for POWER than our nation and its citizenry and that they'll sell us out in a minute. Thus, NOW is the time to put away our petty quarrels and join the NRA, join the Gun Owners of America, Jews for the Preservation of Firearm Ownership, etc. NOW is the time to unite behind a solid Conservative, like LtCol Allan West, Michelle Bachmann, and many other Tea Party politicians, who will fight this tyranny from the White House.

Patrick Henry said it best when he said: "I know not what course others may take but for me, give me liberty or give me death."

Brothers and sisters, we only lose when WE SURRENDER!



  1. Great post Gunny,

    I will add that silence is also "surrender". Americans have been silent for too long and as a result our freedoms have been incrementally sliced away. Fortunately Obama woke up many folks to this fact and now they are engaged in the political process like never before. Evidence is the 2010 elections where the largest numbers of democrat republicans were routed in 70 years.

    The NRA is the most effective 2nd Amendment advocate. I have been a life member for over 30 years and urge everyone to join. They are truly proactive and listen to their membership.

    There are no accidents in politics. Every move has a purpose. Every treaty must be ratified by the Senate with 67 votes for it to become law. Once ratifed it supercedes the constitution.

  2. As a life member of the NRA and the NMLRA (National Muzzle Loading Rifle Association), I can safely say that I have been on the "front lines" of this fight for over 25 years. I have paid for life memberships for all my grandchildren in the NRA. (The only reason that my grandchildren aren't in the NMLRA yet is that really they need to decide that for themselves.)

    Like you Gunny, I like what I see in LTC West and Michelle Bachmann. And we all have at least a year to decide if either are POTUS material. And there are some state governors to look at also.

    Right now in my opinion, we must start identifying the areas of "attack" for the 2013 federal government. The present US House has already gone after Obamacare. Hopefully, the House will start to defund such federal items as entitlements and the bureaucracy.

    Gun control is "dead in the water" at this point in time. The Democrats are only using this to energize their base. UNLESS the Democrats are stupid enough to start a revolution (with a white house executive order on confiscation or registration), I believe that your article indicates the Conservatives' proper response: Show the stupidity of the Left's thinking.

  3. These bastards are like the tide. Just keeps a'rollin' in. To hell with anything the damnable U-frigging-N proposes. What,they want to disarm everyone so as to make the child rape squads work easier? Aside to Gray Ghost: I would not make the mistake of thinking any gun legislation is DOA in the House. Since the Giffords shooting,I think there MAY be some r's who would do the old "go along to get along"schtick. We MUST keep the pressure up on ANY and ALL congcritters to stay away from these predictable knee-jerk reactions,and to actually apply the Constitution here.

  4. I could comment. But you have covered it all very well.
    Don't you just hate the hypocrisy of Hillary, McCain and Hanoi John when it comes toguns?

    Hillary and Hanoi John I can understand. But McCain spouting some crap about the 2nd being for "sportsmen".

  5. That UN gun ban treaty is meaningless. For any treaty to be legally binding on the US, it has to be ratified by 2/3 of the Senate. That's 67 Senators. Does anyone seriously think there are 67 Senators who are going to vote to ratify that abortion?

    Which then raises the second issue on that treaty. The Constitution and its amendments are the "supreme law of the land", as it clearly states within its own text.

    NO treaty can void the Constitution or any part of it. As the Constitution clearly states, the only thing that can change any part of the Constitution is an amendment, and it clearly defines the amendment process itself... which DOESN'T include treaties.

    That gun ban treaty is the same old boogeyman the NRA trots out regularly every time they want to drive for a membership increase. It's pathetic.

  6. Ghost, how can the White House use an executive order to confiscate or register guns? I see absolutely no scenario that makes that possible.

  7. Hardnox,

    I agree with you on the NRA but they have bent over for government before and as such, need to be watched. That said, my son is getting a life membership for his 18th BD because there IS power in numbers.

  8. Gray Ghost,

    Sir Golfsalot just mouthed another BS slogan for his drones but it bears watching. Liberals are like a hydra, cut off one head and two more sprout up.

  9. clyde,

    Perfect summation of the GOP, "go along to get along."

  10. Buck,

    Once again, I'm GLAD BrianR took me to the woodshed on McShamnesty! haha

  11. BrianR,

    Good posts as usual but as we have already seen with this regime, they simply do whatever they want to, via EO, or some bullshit legislation in Congress. And if the SCOTUS swings against us?

  12. Gunny, there's no legislation in Congress that can authorize that treaty other than the prescribed ratification process: 2/3 approval in the Senate.

    As to the Heller and McDonald cases: those are now settled law. I think worries on that score are misplaced. Think of it this way: there's now a 5-4 majority in our direction. What do you think the chances are that they'll reverse Roe v. Wade? I'd put those chances at just about zero.

    You have to understand the nature of the rulings in those two cases. They clearly defined and recognized gun rights as enshrined in the Bill of Rights and incorporated it to the states. That's the same thing as carving it in granite. It's almost like the Dred Scott case: the country had to pass the 14th Amendment to overturn Dred Scott.

    Further, since SCOTUS has handed down those rulings, any attempt by Bat Ears to try to confiscate or register guns by executive order would, in my opinion, lead to his almost immediate impeachment, a process that starts in the House which is now controlled by the GOP.

    His issuance of such an EO would be a violation of his executive authority as EOs can only be used to facilitate carrying out legislated law, would be in violation of the SCOTUS rulings, and would also be in violation of his powers as only Congress has the authority to legislate.

    I just don't see it.

  13. That having been said, as I think about it....

    In a way, I'd like to see him try it. Man, the shitstorm he'd bring down on his own head would be great!

  14. BrianR,

    One, your knowledge of the Constitution and Civics is flawless, YOU NEED TO RUN FOR OFFICE!

    Two, I could not agree with your post more.

    Three, what I am afraid of is his CONTEMPT and DISREGARD of the Constitution in his quest to do whatever the hell he wants to do. Liberals and incrementalism brother, scares the hell out of me.

  15. LOL!

    Thanks, Guns, but I think I'm done with the idea of running for office. I'd rather spend time with my granddaughter, and I sure as hell would never want to live in the DC area again. I could hardly wait to get away from there! Much as I'm awash in lefties out here, I do love SoCal.

    As to Bat Ears: yep, no doubt about it. He must chafe at night and lose sleep over the fact that he's not Emperor Obamarama.