Thursday, May 26, 2011


Obama is an idiot, this we all know. As a Marxist Muslim, he has to seize the guns of us bitter clingers because we're not falling into line with his regime. Thus, there should be no wonder WHY Obama has been named the NRA's Gun Salesman in 2008, 2009, 2010, and probably 2011!

EXCERPT: "On March 30, the 30th anniversary of the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan, Jim Brady, who sustained a debilitating head wound in the attack, and his wife, Sarah, came to Capitol Hill to push for a ban on the controversial "large magazines." Brady, for whom the law requiring background checks on handgun purchasers is named, then met with White House press secretary Jay Carney. During the meeting, President Obama dropped in and, according to Sarah Brady, brought up the issue of gun control, "to fill us in that it was very much on his agenda," she said.

"I just want you to know that we are working on it," Brady recalled the president telling them. "We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar."

Under the radar is Obama code for pissing on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and all we hold dear. Now Sh*tcago, the sewer that Obama crawled out of to plague us like a horde of lice, has had a gun ban forever, thanks to the moronic libs that rule that sh*thole, and their violent crime is off the charts. Legal citizens cannot own guns but criminals can.

Odd that Obama and Holder allow the ATF to sell automatic weapons to the Mexican drug cartels but they don't want Americans to own em?

One, the Gunny is buying yet ANOTHER load of surplus ammo from CMP.

Two, the Gunny recommends that y'all buy as many guns and ammo as you can.

Three, when they come for em, we shoot them down like dogs.

Now liberal asshats will go into convulsions over number three but there is a historical point here that backs that statement up.

"If every Jewish and anti-nazi family in Germany had owned a Mauser rifle and twenty rounds of ammunition and the will to use it, Adolf Hitler would be a little-known footnote to the history of the Weimar Republic." Aaron Zelman Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership.

Also, when the Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto got a hold of a few revolvers and rifles, they threw back the German troops and SS troops sent in their to get them. By killing them, the others refused to go in!

So the arrogant and smug little caesar should take a read of history, and maybe he can invite Bibi Netanyahu over here again to school him on history, because we've already fought ONE revolution over gun control and if he thinks Americans will lay down for it now, he's sadly mistaken. A gun free America is a place where tyrants like Obama could send his enemies to the reeducation camp of their choice.

Hey Barry...



  1. "If every Jewish and anti-nazi family in Germany had owned a Mauser rifle and twenty rounds of ammunition and the will to use it, Adolf Hitler would be a little-known footnote to the history of the Weimar Republic." Aaron Zelman Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership.

    Imagine if the Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto would have had guns.

  2. The liberals need to wake up to the fact that if Obama can dismiss the 2nd Amendment with a stroke of his pen, the 1st, 4th , and 5th can not be far behind.

    On a more positive note, as I have noted here in the past, if Ngyuen Thran could make a workable pistol with a piece of metal and a file 45 years ago, what could Joe Sixpack do today with some high grade steel and the Craftsman drill press and lathe in his garage? Also can they ban sulphur graphite and saltpeter?

  3. Gunny,
    This "man" has wanted for so long to be a dictator, that this is a way to reach that goal, to his way of thinking.
    I think it will be the straw that breaks the camels back with anyone that isn't sure about voting him our of office.
    We all know that the blacks, and unions would be exempt!!

  4. ferrellgummit,

    Indeed. They DID get them, after killing Nazis and taking them.

  5. Pack Rat,

    Not to mention the things I learned FROM my government in the Marines and in other schools.

  6. Nanna,

    Indeed. Criminals are ALREADY exempt since, wonder of wonders, they IGNORE the laws.

    If they come for my guns, I will open fire and I encourage others to do the same.

  7. It would please me to use a Rooskie rifle to battle commies. I think I have enough 7.62x54R for it...

  8. There is that phrase again,"under the radar". So much for "The Most Transparent Administration In History".Every goddamn thing these assholes do is under the radar. The ONLY thing transparent here is the dickweed's thin skin.

  9. Packrat beat me to the punch! Let's vote Obama out before more damage is wrought.

    By the way, I'd thought you like these videos.


  10. Bill of Rights? I thought Liberals never made it past "We the People..."

  11. Larry,

    The irony of it! I doubt that it will come to that because Obama and his minions don't have the guts to stand up to a morally righteous and angry people.

  12. clyde,

    Exactly right. I PRAY that the trials begin once we boot these maggots out. Although I am sure that pardons will be for sale in 2012/2013.

  13. Eric,

    Never underestimate the stupidity of liberal voters. Gas could be 10 bucks a gallon, Zero could blame it on Bush, and the morons would still vote for Obonehead.

  14. Hardnox,

    I'm betting that when push comes to shove, it'll be a few million of us...against them.

  15. Ralph,

    INDEED! Moreover, the two morons Obummer put in the SCOTUS never got that far either!

  16. Yeah, I saw that article today, too.

    I really got a chuckle out of it. It just proves what a neophyte and bonehead Bat Ears really is.

    He evidently thinks he can impose gun control by imperial fiat. Unfortunately for him, SCOTUS already decided the issue in the Heller and McDonald cases.

    So, let's say he tries to issue an executive order or instruct one of the fed agencies to impose some kind of rule. What's going to be the result of that?

    Obviously, a slew of lawsuits, and his actions are going to be enjoined from taking effect.

    He lost a big one today in SCOTUS... again. Arizona is free to enforce its sanctions against employers who hire illegal aliens, and they clearly stated that states DO have powers to enforce federal immigration laws. What do you think that means for his suit against Arizona's SB1070?

    He's going to lose THAT one, too.

    IF he tries this crap against gun ownership, he'll just lose again.

    I really have to wonder if he's really stupid enough to try it, in light of all this, or whether he's just throwing some red meat to his base's wolves.

  17. Anon,

    Thanks for reading and commenting. Please make sure that the word gets out. THAT is what is most important.

  18. BrianR,

    I LAUGHED when I read that article on AZ.

    I'm beginning to wonder if Obama isn't simply throwing sh*t at the wall to see if it sticks. After all, it costs him NOTHING to run lawsuit after lawsuit as Holder is his little b*tch and does whatever Barry wants.

    As in the world of counter-terrorism and anti-terrorism, we have to be lucky every time, the tangos only have to be lucky once! And so it is with this shate.

    Where Obama has it made is that he can toss the red meat to his base, then renege on it, and the idiots will still vote for him.

    I'm of the opinion, more and more, that we will only resolve this and all the other crap, if we give the NE to the libs and wall the bastards off. They are nothing less than an infecetious virus.

  19. Well, that's true in a sense, Guns.

    But when the terrs DO "get lucky once", what they end up doing is triggering the wrath of God down on their heads.

    That's the real issue: enjoy a tactical victory, and end up losing the strategic war?

    A Pyrrhic victory?

    Pretty worthless overall.

    Is he really THAT stupid?

    Maybe so....

    I sure haven't seen any evidence to the contrary.

  20. Hitler had his brownshirts; Obamao has the Panthers...with Rev. Wright as their general/chaplain. The blacks are always going to support him...the drug gangs will turn into militias.

  21. Today the lib mind wants to ban firearms.
    They say to lower crime. Or because criminals might get them..(?)..(!)

    Can't you just see these limp wrists say about 150 years ago on the frontier wanting to ban firearms because the Indians might get them?

  22. BrianR,

    I truly believe that Obama is a puppet on Soros' strings and there to simply do what he is told and enjoy the trappings of being POTUS. He is a sacrifical lamb tossed into the arena, to try and radically change the nation but they underestimated us.

    We ain't buying off on it.

  23. Anon,

    I wish they'd hurry up and get busy. I just sighted in my 03 for 700 yards point fire with my new scope!

  24. Buck,

    HAHA. At this point, NOTHING these morons say surprises me.

  25. Like it or not (I know, at heart we're all a bunch of sweethearts.......), the Second Amendment serves to protect all other amendments (within the Bill of Rights) when you think about it. You take it away and you are left defenseless, be it yourself, as well, all other amendments within the Bill of Rights.

    What is tragic is that most supposedly learned individuals do not realize that the Bill of Rights are reserved to the states and not endowed by the federal government. Think about that. Arguably, the most abused amendment is that of the Tenth, to a near equal extent the Ninth. Think about that.

    It was Patrick Henry and his anti-Federalist confreres (thank goodness) who saw to the creation, insertion of the Bill of Rights. They knew well in advance that between the Executive, Legislative and ultimately Judicial Branch, if a "triumvirate" as it were could be realized, the same tyranny they were attempting to defeat would, no surprise, rear its ugly head within this newly formed Republic. They knew.

    We are now witness to this very possibility via the fraudulent, lying, hubris-ridden, hate-filled, anti-American, crime committing, subversive negro (Marxist) posing as "president" and his junta. These are incredibly scary times. And so many Americans, in truth, ignoramae are just standing there, wholly unaware of what has been accomplished, moreover, what is on the horizon.

    Think of this........ Our "military". In truth, one big dumbed down, beyond ruined, anything goes, no discipline, predominantly Third World welfare state joke. It is. But it's still the military. And who is in charge? Who orders the US military? You know the answer. What if the "Commander in Chief" were to order Martial Law and engage the (his) military to uphold same? Think about that. This is the same individual who screamed with venomous and megalomaniac hatred in his eyes for a "civilian national security force", just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as the US military.

    Calling Henrich Himmler.............

    You take this lightly? You think this negro is not envisioning to be another Mugabe, Amin, etc.? You'd best awaken to how much inherent hatred is staring you down, how the US Constitution, the Supreme Court are currently serving as infuriating impediment against this subversive and his. But for how long will they prevail. Take out the Second Amendment and the rest fall like dominoes.

    That's the plan, fools.

    The Bill of Rights are endowed to the states, to the people. Not by and for the federal government or this overtaking junta residing in D.C.

  26. John,

    Brother, get yourself a blog and get busy. Great post.

    The more I study the writings of our Founders, the more I realize that they were a cabal of near genuises or genuises, who, guided by God, created a helluva country.

  27. Yeah, John. Your post is food for thought.

    I am also wondering about the oath to protect and defend the Constitution that we all, officer and enlisted alike, took upon entering the service.
    Should the president order something like martial law, would these people stand up and say, "No!"?
    Or is the entire upper echlon of the military a bunch of politicians like Mike Mullen and ...can't think of his name...the general at Fort Hood...

  28. The military is only required to obey the "lawful" orders of those placed in charge. In theory, you can't get in trouble for disobeying an unlawful order, but you can get in trouble for obeying unlawful orders. The real problem is in knowing the difference.